Sheffield Methods Institute doctoral opportunities
Complete a PhD with the Sheffield Methods Institute (SMI) and you’ll discover what it means to be multidisciplinary.
About the Sheffield Methods Institute (SMI)
The SMI offers you the opportunity to do a PhD in interdisciplinary social science subjects that don’t fit neatly into a single departmental ‘box’.
The SMI is part of the School of Education in the University of Sheffield’s Faculty of Social Sciences. It has a range of academic staff engaged in interdisciplinary social research using robust quantitative and qualitative methods. It also has strong links with the other social science departments in the faculty.
It delivers interdisciplinary undergraduate and postgraduate social science degree programmes and PhD-level training in social research methods.
The academic staff in the SMI have a range of social science backgrounds (including sociology, geography, politics, economics, etc) but all work in research areas that do not fit neatly into those disciplinary silos.
How we rank
- The University of Sheffield is a member of the Russell Group of 24 research-intensive universities.
- 92 per cent of research and its real-world impact at the University of Sheffield has been rated as 'world-leading' or 'internationally excellent'.
Our research
Our work is summarised into the five themes listed below - each colleague has a particular research interest within these themes.
If you are interested in doing a PhD based around one of these themes, or the research mentioned in one of the academic staff profiles, get in touch with us to discuss it further.
Whatever stage of your research career, we would be interested to discuss with you how the SMI can help you achieve your future social science research goals.
- Inequality
-
Andy’s research in this area has primarily focused on the impact of growing up in poverty on children’s cognitive and non-cognitive development, and on child obesity. This research has also examined what it means to be in poverty, and whether our conventional income-based measures can adequately capture the experience of being poor.
Much of Andy’s work focuses on inequalities broadly defined: that is, why do individuals have different levels of mental health, or income, or education. What multi-dimensional factors cause these differences to occur? This can be both at the individual or higher spatial levels (eg inequalities between neighbourhoods)
Beth’s work generally falls within the theme of inequality: her PhD explored income-based mental health inequalities in UK children and their parents. Before this she contributed to research projects on multiple deprivation and worklessness. She has also undertaken work into the childhood precursors of adult success for the Social Mobility Commission as well as also undertaking quantitative and mixed-methods research on UK food poverty.
Will’s research interests focus on the production and experience of inequality in contemporary society. His studies address a range of themes including community, youth, race, consumption, identities, crime and deviance. Much of his work has been rooted in community settings, though he also has experience of organisational research, within youth work and social work settings.
Siobhan's research has considered gender and network-related differences in music composition and performance selected as useful examples of highly-competitive niche occupations. She has also considered gender differences in beliefs and perceptions relating to religion and health behaviours. More broadly, she is interested in how differences in housing tenure affect political attitudes.
Kate Reed
Kate’s research includes a focus on inequality in health, exploring disparities in health according to issues of social class, gender and race and ethnicity. Her interests in this area lie particularly with health technology and reproductive health.
Mark’s work on the sociology of culture includes a strong focus on inequality, aiming to understand both attendance and participation in culture, and cultural work, with reference to contemporary social inequalities. He also works on attitudes investigating how people account for and explain social inequalities.
Much of Abigail’s research investigates inequality and uses a feminist theoretical perspective. Her PhD considered gendered, classed and racial inequalities in appearance expectations and the implications for education and work experience across the life course. She has also investigated the representation of women on the UK school curriculum as PI for an outreach programme. Her most recent work has focused on inequality and identity within workforces, organisations and professions.
Calum Webb’s research explores socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in the child welfare system and how they relate to social policy and the funding of children’s services. His work highlights that children from the poorest neighbourhoods in England are ten times more likely to be in the children’s social care system, and that the most deprived local authorities in England have seen the largest cuts to their children’s services funding since 2010.
Lauren's research focuses on the everyday experiences of inequality with a particular emphasis on health, illness, and disability. This includes everyday barriers which affect access and participation and how ableism and disablism shape diverse social bodies. This also includes an acknowledgement of how these inequalities intersect with gender, race, class, age and place.
- Social justice and inclusion
-
The role of education and skills in determining individuals’ labour market outcomes is a key element of Andy’s research, which is partly sponsored by the UK Department for Education. This includes the analysis of gender differentials in both education and earnings, the importance of peer groups at school, and the socioeconomic factors which impact on the transition from education into work.
Beth’s recent research into homelessness has explored the theme of inclusion in relation to housing status and access to work.
Will’s work seeks to reflect principles of social justice and inclusivity. Social deprivation and the experiential dimensions of associated hardships have featured in much of his work, as have the processes by which inequalities are constructed and reproduced by powerful groups.
Siobhan is interested in reducing inequalities in civic and labour force participation, particularly those relating political and cultural socialisation, and promoting public health messaging to protect the vulnerable. She supervises Samir Sweida-Metwally's doctoral research into religious inequalities in employment and job quality.
Along with Gwilym Pryce, Aneta looks at the role of spatial segregation and ‘social frontiers’ for shaping community cohesion, crime levels and individual life outcomes (eg education, social mobility, integration of immigrants). Aneta works with colleagues on ongoing mixed-methods research, especially the ‘Living in Difference’ project data looking at generations in Poland and responses to difference.
Kate Reed
Kate works collaboratively with charities, and public and private sector organisations to address issues relating to injustice in healthcare.
Mark collaborates closely with a charity that aims to challenge and confront issues of inequality in the arts and culture.
Abigail’s work on workforce, organisations and professions engages with issues of inclusion in regards to workforce makeup, job quality and career progression. She has also looked at inclusion and access in regards to health and social care provision and quality of care provided.
Is it fair that children from some ethnic minority groups, or children living in poverty, are more likely to be taken into state care than others? What implications does this have for children’s rights to family life? Calum Webb’s research addresses these injustices and how they may be perpetuated through social structures and policies. He has created data visualisation tools to help turn this research into action that promotes social change.
Lauren's research is driven by a commitment to social justice and social change. She seeks to centre inclusion in research methods and design and communicating social research, as well as substantively striving for inclusion for those who are excluded in the context of health, illness, and disability.
- Mobility and migration
-
Two of Andy’s current PhD students are examining different issues in mobility. The first is looking at intergenerational income mobility and its determinants. The second is examining intergenerational education mobility. In both cases, the role of parental background, including their income and education, is paramount. Advantage (and disadvantage) is inherited.
Andy is working on a paper with Aneta, looking at age, period and cohort effects on attitudes towards migration. He is also interested in what happens when people move into neighbourhoods - as opposed to, what happens when neighbourhoods change.
Beth’s recent research into homelessness has explored the theme of mobility in relation to housing and homelessness experiences.
Migration connects to Will’s research in that, much of his work engages with diasporic communities who share complex migration histories. Will’s work has explored the identity politics and inequalities faced by minority groups, particularly young people.
Siobhan is interested in differences between immigrant generations, examining how those raised in Britain tend to have different patterns of civic engagement and trust compared with those who moved to Britain as a child, who in turn are distinct from those who moved in adulthood.
Kate Reed
Kate is very experienced in supervising PhD projects where race is the core substantive subject. She has also published on raced aspects of healthcare participation and experience. She was also involved in the developing the pioneering WR DTP ring-fenced scholarships for Black British students in collaboration with the Stuart Hall Foundation.
Mark works on social mobility, particularly with reference to the makeup of work in the cultural and creative industries has changed since 1971: how far do contemporary class inequalities in these jobs simply reflect longer-term trends?
A substantial part of Aneta’s work explores responses to ethnic diversity and international migration at the individual-level for example, prejudice and tolerance, wellbeing and at community level and social cohesion. Aneta's comparative cross-national research exploring differences and responses to immigration mostly uses European Social Survey data.
Lauren is particularly interested in everyday mobilities. She has explored this in particular through everyday experiences of access to toilets in public space and how infrastructures of provision are necessary for mobilities. Most recently, she has been developing research for workers on the move. This includes exploring barriers to toilet access for couriers and delivery drivers and mobile workers more broadly.
- Participation
-
Will is experienced in the use of qualitative approaches within community settings. His ongoing studies use a community-based participatory approach to explore residents’ experiences of services in a low income neighbourhood and to explore the experiences of young people and families in areas of deprivation. Will is particularly interested in university-community partnership and the ethics of reciprocity in social research.
Siobhan's research partly addresses social behaviours, notably electoral participation, civic engagement, religious practice, and 'taking part' in cultural activities.
Who participates in culture; how does this relate to social inequality; what does it mean to participate in culture in the first place? Mark works with both survey data and transactional data (for example, from box offices) to unpack cultural participation.
Lauren has a track record of working alongside community partners, charities and organisations which have typically centred around health and social care. She strives towards participatory forms of research and methods of co-production. This includes a commitment to public engagement and creatively disseminating research with partners which is a central feature of Lauren’s work.
- Methods and methodology
-
Andy is an applied economist and econometrician. Most of his research involves using large scale survey and administrative data, and micro longitudinal/panel data on individuals and households, including matched datasets.
Andy works on developing and critiquing quantitative methods, with a focus on multilevel models, age-period-cohort analysis and fixed/random effects models
Although a quantitative researcher by training, Beth has recently begun to undertake qualitative research, with a particular focus on lifecourse and visual methods.
Will uses a wide range of methods in his work, including ethnography, qualitative interviewing, focus groups, case studies, co-construction and community based-participatory approaches.
Siobhan enjoys scouting for unusual data sources and making use of them in new ways - particularly directory data and secondary data gathered for very different research projects to her own. She also integrates born-digital and survey data to harness the advantages of both network analytic and survey methods. In a previous life as a policy economist, she conducted elite interviews and focus groups, and occasionally returns to qualitative methods to learn about policy areas for research purposes.
Working with European Social Survey data looking at item nonresponse patterns, Aneta's first paper - 2014, wave 7, exploring nonresponse to questions measuring attitudes towards immigration, her second paper (currently a work in progress) is more of a broad research of all ESS waves and exploring nonresponse to various questions.
Kate Reed
Kate is a qualitative researcher with a particular interest in creative and mobile ethnographic approaches.
Mark’s particularly interested in data visualisation in social research: how can we communicate what we’ve found more clearly and effectively?
Abigail’s ethos as a qualitative researcher stems from her early training in feminist research methods and emphasises criticality and reflexivity. Abigail uses a wide range of methods including: interviews, focus groups, observations, case studies, Normalisation Process Theory, and document, discourse and thematic analysis.
Calum Webb’s 3-year British Academy fellowship will explore the use of novel structural equation models to better understand patterns and processes in the child welfare system and their local variation. His previous work has used multilevel modelling, latent growth modelling, latent class analysis and and integrated mixed methods designs. He has acted as a technical advisor to the Department for Education, as a methodological consultant for Kingston University, and currently sits on the Research Advisory Board of Cafcass.
Lauren uses a wide range of qualitative, creative research methods that are ethnographically driven and informed. These include qualitative interviewing, diary methods, go-along, walking, and mobile methods, object elicitations and material methods. Lauren is also committed to participatory research methods and co-production. She is also interested in feminist and relational ethics in practice.
Course structure
Your PhD supervision could be split between an SMI academic and an academic in another social sciences department.
All PhD students within the Faculty of Social Sciences have access to world-class training alongside your doctoral study. The training you take can be tailored to your individual needs to ensure you have the right skills you need to develop your research.
This training programme is designed to exceed current UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) training and development guidelines and gives all our social science PhD students access to ESRC-funded White Rose Doctoral Training Partnership regardless of your source of funding.
The training is flexible and bespoke to your needs which you will discuss with your PhD supervisors.
1+3
Students looking to undertake PhD study within the Faculty of Social Sciences will require a strong understanding of the full breadth of social science research methods.
Many students are required to take the one-year MA Social Research degree with the SMI before progressing on to their PhD studies.
This year of study develops students' knowledge of research design, quantitative and qualitative methods, develops their professional skills, and allows them to take specialist and advanced subject-based courses in the field of their research topics whilst further developing the themes of your research.
Your application
Our guidance details how to apply for a research degree with us.
What to prepare before applying
- Entry Requirements
-
- All PhD applicants need to have two (or more) PhD supervisors agree to supervise them before an application will be accepted.
- All PhD applicants will need to have had an interview with their PhD supervisors to be accepted.
- All PhD applications need a proposal to be accepted. Guidance on how to write a proposal can be found here.
- Applicants should have an undergraduate degree that is equivalent to upper second-class honours (2:1) or above in the UK.
- Applicants should also have or expect to obtain a master’s degree with merit (or international equivalent) in social research or a related subject.
- Applicants whose first language is not English and who do not hold a degree from an English-speaking university will need to take an English language test. Applicants must achieve one of the following minimum test scores:
- IELTS 7 (with 6.5 in each component) or University equivalent
- What to prepare before applying
-
- Study the specialty areas of the school members and identify potential supervisors who work in your field and could guide you through the PhD journey. All PhD applicants need to have spoken to and have at least two PhD supervisors agree to supervise them before an application will be accepted.
- Develop a research proposal using the provided guidance.
- Explore the available funding opportunities and make sure that you meet their eligibility requirements and deadlines.
Scholarships
- University of Sheffield Scholarships
-
Find out more about our PhD scholarships including how to apply.
- WRDTP Scholarships
-
You may be eligible for nomination by your supervisors to the WRDTP studentships.
Find out more about all ESRC White Rose Social Science DTP scholarships. Below are the SMI’s departmental guidance and internal deadlines for applications. Please ensure you follow the below for your application.
SMI Internal timelines and guidance for WRDTP applications:
PhD Application - 3rd of January 2025
To be considered for a WRDTP PhD scholarship or 1+3 MA and PhD scholarship, you should submit a PhD application no later than the 3rd of January 2025. We strongly recommend submitting the application by the end of December 2024.
5pm 22nd January 2025
Completed the WRDTP application form online via PG Online
A departmental internal review will take place after this deadline and selected applications will proceed to a faculty level review panel. All applicants will be updated on decisions following each review stage.
26th February 2025
Deadline for Faculty to submit selected applications to the WRDTP
Decisions: April 2025
- WRoCAH Scholarship
-
Find out more about WRoCAH scholarships. Below are the SMI’s departmental guidance and internal deadlines for applications. Please ensure you follow the below for your application.
PhD Application - 3rd of January 2025
To be considered for a WRoCAH PhD scholarship, you should submit a PhD application no later than the 3rd of January 2025. We strongly recommend submitting the application by the end of December 2024.
Full application submitted to the department for review/ support letter writing - 5pm 22 January 2025
All scholarship applications must be submitted to the faculty review panel before they are submitted to WRoCAH.
Faculty will then make a recommendation on whether the application should be put forward directly to WRoCAH.
All scholarship applications are made directly to WRoCAH by the candidate.
- Sheffield Methods Institute (SMI) Studentships
-
The Sheffield Methods Institute (SMI) at the University of Sheffield invites applications to two fully-funded three-year PhD scholarships.
The projects will focus on the application and/or development of robust research methods (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) to an interdisciplinary social science project.
A member of academic staff within the SMI will be the primary supervisor for the project, although it may be appropriate for second/third supervisors to be from other disciplinary departments in the University.
The PhD project should be broadly related to one or more of the SMI’s research themes:
- Inequality
- Social Justice and inclusion
- Mobility and Migration
- Participation
- Methods and Methodology
Find out more about these themes and how the research of the SMI Academic team aligns with them.
Applications are assessed based on the candidate’s qualifications, the strength and innovation of their research proposal, the fit of the project proposal within the SMI and the comments from referees.
Applicants should emphasise the research methods contribution and the interdisciplinary nature of their proposed project.
Award details
The studentships available are +3 (PhD only) programmes. The next awards available will commence on 1 October 2026.
The awards include:
- Full tuition fees at the Home rate (minimum £4,849 per year)
- An annual maintenance grant for three years, at the standard RCUK rate (minimum £19,162 per year for your living costs, paid in regular instalments)
- A Research and Training Support Grant of £750 per year
Eligibility
Students should have a good first degree (at least a 2:1) and a good social science masters-level degree (a grade of at least 65 in the UK system, or equivalent) that comprehensively covers research design and methods (such as the MA in Social Research).
Conditional offers can be made for students currently on such a masters-level course.
Funding is available to students at the Home fee rate only.
How to apply
In the first instance, students must make contact with a prospective primary supervisor in the SMI that they would like to work with, with a one to two page outline of the PhD project that they would like to undertake.
If the supervisor agrees, you will develop a full PhD proposal. If you are unsure about who to approach in the first instance, email smi@sheffield.ac.uk
Candidates should then apply through the University’s central Postgraduate Online Application form, and select SMIR03 as the programme for which you are applying. Please state your desire to apply for scholarship funding in the first line of the PhD proposal.
You should submit both your PhD proposal, and a personal statement.
More information on writing a PhD proposal.
The proposal can be a maximum of two pages long (excluding references) and address the following points:
- The research aim and planned structure of the PhD project, including what the original contribution will be.- The methods and/or data you intend to use for your PhD
- The interdisciplinary nature of your project, and how it fits in the SMI research themes
- The potential wider impacts of your research beyond academia
- Any ethical issues and how you will address them.
The personal statement should be up to one page. It should address:
- Your research interest(s) and background
- Why you want to do a PhD in the SMI
- Your academic performance and experience, with particular focus on research- and methods-based modules
For more general information about the scholarships and the SMI, email smi@sheffield.ac.uk
Applications are next expected to open in late 2025 for September 2026 entry.
Application Deadlines
To be considered for a WRDTP PhD scholarship, you should submit a PhD application no later than the 3rd of January 2025. We strongly recommend submitting the application by the end of December 2024.
Applications without a scholarship are accepted all year round.
Length of programme
The Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes contains a wide range of information required by both students and their academic departments from the point of registration onto a higher degree by research, to the point of award, including time scales allowed for the completion of a PhD.
However, a benchmark for this information is:
Full-time PhD
- Three years (normal)
- Four years (maximum)
Part-time PhD
- Six years (normal)
- Eight years (maximum)
Contact Us
If you have any questions, please contact smi-pgr@sheffield.ac.uk or the PhD Programme Director Abigail L Tazzyman - a.tazzyman@sheffield.ac.uk