Dr Lucy Clarke (she/they)
BA (Oxon), MA (KCL), DPhil (Oxon)
School of History, Philosophy and Digital Humanities
Early Career Fellow
Full contact details
School of History, Philosophy and Digital Humanities
- Profile
-
I am an interdisciplinary historian of early modern England. I am specifically interested in the processes and experiences of state formation and quotidian encounters with the law, and how political ideas ramified in three dimensions, as bodies moving in space as much as words.
My DPhil thesis, completed at Jesus College, Oxford, took a new approach to the early modern state, by considering the state as an inherently performed concept. The thesis examined the presentation of the state in early modern drama in performance, investigating how a selection of plays performed in the outdoor theatres of late Elizabethan and early Jacobean London manifested their own versions of the state. This work, which I am now revising for publication as a monograph, argues that the state was a concept easily apprehensible by ordinary Londoners, without the term ‘state’ ever needing to be used. The drama, therefore, was not simply talking about political discourse: it was political discourse. As such, understanding and criticism of the state was not limited to the upper echelons of society.
My current research project, funded by the Leverhulme Trust, develops upon my doctoral work. It seeks to write the first history of state formation as a performative process, examining how magistrates in the period 1558-1641 enacted authority. This work draws its primary source base from the records of the Court of Star Chamber, the prime venue for those accused of disobeying, disrespecting or otherwise shaming authority. I am interested in how magisterial authority was practised in every-day encounters between magistrates and those they attempted to govern, and thus how the state came into being in these quotidian interactions. My methodology is multimodal, beginning with detailed archival research into specific types of magisterial performance – arrests, crowd calming, intervention in fights – in an attempt to reconstruct both the way that such performances took place, and how they were received. The fictive strategies of Star Chamber bills, cross-referenced with contemporary jurisprudential texts, allow me to build up a picture of the expectations and concerns of both litigants and the Court itself. I then turn to practice-as-research, asking actors to stage selected incidents from the Star Chamber records that I have turned into scripts. These workshops provide invaluable insights into how magistrates enacted authority, and reveal problems with the enactment of the state that are otherwise absent from the historical record. By using PAR, I’m able to engage with the state as it came into being: as embodied action that was interpreted by those present. This aspect of my work is also vital for thinking about how secure state authority actually was: by thinking about the state as performed, then, I’m able to challenge the overly pacified model of English state formation.
I joined the School in October 2023 as a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow. Before coming to Sheffield, I was Teaching Fellow in History and Literature at the University of Warwick (2022-3), Lecturer in English (including Theatre) at Wroxton College, Fairleigh Dickinson University (2021-2), and Tutor in History and English at various Oxford colleges (2019-2022). During my DPhil, I held a Jesus College Graduate Scholarship (2018-20) and a Scouloudi Doctoral Fellowship at the Institute of Historical Research, London (2020-21). I was also a Short-Term Fellow at the Huntington Library, San Marino, California in July 2022.
- Qualifications
-
- BA History and English, Regent’s Park College, University of Oxford (2013-16)
- MA Shakespeare Studies, King’s College London and Shakespeare’s Globe (2016-17)
- DPhil History, Jesus College, University of Oxford (2017-2022)
- Research interests
-
My work hinges upon a conception of the early modern state as inherently performed: I am interested in how the state was brought into being in practice, both in terms of what magistrates attempting to exert state authority actually did to legitimise themselves, and how these practices were received by those present. These practices were bound up with the law, and so at heart I am a socio-legal historian, and I am passionate about revealing the depth of legal understanding among ‘ordinary’ early modern people. However, in my interest in the state as something that came into being when authority was practised successfully, I am also concerned with how constitutional and jurisprudential debates over the nature of the state intersected with the quotidian practice of authority. As such, I am also deeply interested in the intellectual-legal history of state formation, and seek to bring these two poles of historiography together in my own work.
In my conceptualisation of the state, moreover, I draw upon broader concepts of ‘political engagement’ and ‘political thought’ that engage not simply with what was said and heard, but what was done and seen. My focus on the embodied nature of law and government deploys insights from sociology and performance studies, and offers a view of early modern state power that considers the state as it was experienced at the time. My approach is fundamentally non-statist: in exploring the state as performed, my work reckons with the fragility of state power where historians have previously not done so. My work therefore does not treat a naturalised, bureaucratised state as inevitable, an approach which has considerable resonances with contemporary questions about the nature of legitimate power in our society. I am particularly interested in how resistance to magistrates took place, and what such resistance reveals about popular notions of legality and legitimacy, and indeed how this speaks to our current political moment.
My work’s focus on the state as performed leads me to draw upon my training in early modern theatre studies, which offers me a vocabulary to anatomise state authority in greater depth than has previously occurred. Practice-as-research is a key pillar of my work, both in terms of offering insights into how interactions between magistrates and their communities took place, but also due to its tendency to pose questions that otherwise I wouldn’t have thought of! Some of my biggest breakthroughs have come as a result of actors asking questions about how they should read a warrant to the ‘criminal’ they are arresting, or as I have tried to work out how to stage a particular riot. I retain an interest in how early modern drama participated in political discourse, specifically with regard to early modern performance conditions and culture. I am also broadly interested in how practice-based methods may be used by historians working in all periods, and in innovative approaches to interdisciplinary history.
- Publications
-
Journal articles
- Testing the ”participatory state” in A Yorkshire Tragedy (c. 1605-8). Cultural and Social History, 19(5), 509-528. View this article in WRRO
- ‘I say I must for I am the kings Shrieve’: magistrates invoking the monarch’s name in 1 Henry VI (1592) and The Downfall of Robert Earl of Huntingdon (1598). Historical Research, 95(268), 196-212. View this article in WRRO
- Emma Whipday. Shakespeare’s Domestic Tragedies: Violence in the Early Modern Home. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Pp 262.. Early Theatre, 24(1), 197-200. View this article in WRRO
Book reviews
- The Duchess of Malfi. Shakespeare Bulletin, 38(2), 271-274.
- Grants
-
- Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship
- Public Engagement
I recently appeared on the Warwick student radio show, The Warwick History Hour, to talk about my research on state formation as performance. Listen here.
In April 2020 I featured on episode 6 of Greg Jenner’s Audible Original podcast, A Somewhat Complete History of Sitting Down.